Macro Tracking Apps Compared

Five tracking apps cover the entire market. Pick one based on what you actually want to track and how much you're willing to manage.

Key takeaways
Ad Slot — Top

Quick comparison table

App Free tier Strength Weakness
MyFitnessPalLimited (barcode behind paywall)Massive crowdsourced food DB, every restaurant coveredLots of inaccurate user-submitted entries; ad-heavy
CronometerFull free tier with adsCurated database, full vitamins/minerals trackingSmaller restaurant coverage; less polished UX
MacroFactor2-week trial onlyAlgorithm adjusts targets weekly based on real dataSubscription-only; learning curve
CarbonNoWeekly check-in adjustments, simple to followRequires another app for food logging
Lose It!Yes (basic)Friendlier UX than MFP, good US barcode coverageMacro tracking gated behind premium

MyFitnessPal

The default. The food database is enormous because anyone can add entries — which is also its biggest weakness. Search "chicken breast" and you'll find dozens of entries with macros that disagree by 30%. The fix is to pick one accurate entry per food (verify against USDA values) and star it as a favorite. Once you've built a personal library, MFP is fast.

Pros: barcode scanner with the largest US/UK product coverage; recipe import from URLs; meal copy from any past day. Cons: free tier is increasingly stripped; ad-heavy.

Cronometer

The serious tracker's choice. Database is smaller but vetted (NCCDB, USDA backbone). Tracks 80+ nutrients including vitamins, minerals, individual amino acids, and omega-3/6 ratios. Best for people who want to see whether they're actually hitting magnesium and B12 — not just protein.

Pros: accuracy; micronutrient depth; clean UI. Cons: smaller restaurant database; barcode coverage thinner outside North America.

MacroFactor

The newest serious player. You log weight and intake; the algorithm calculates your real TDEE every week and adjusts your calorie target so you stay on track for whatever rate you set. No more manual cuts every six weeks. Built by the team behind Stronger By Science, so the underlying methodology is solid.

Pros: adaptive coaching that actually works; clean food database; great for people who plateau. Cons: subscription-only after the trial (~$72/year); requires consistency for the algorithm to learn.

Ad Slot — In-Content

Carbon Diet Coach

Built by Layne Norton. You log weight and check in weekly; Carbon tells you to bump or cut calories. It doesn't include a full food logging interface — pair it with MFP or another logger. Best for people who want a "coach in an app" without joining an actual coaching service.

Pros: simple, structured weekly adjustments. Cons: not a one-stop app; subscription-only.

Lose It!

The friendlier MFP alternative. Smaller database but cleaner UX, and a snap-a-photo logging feature that works surprisingly well for packaged foods. Macros are paywalled in the premium tier.

Pros: easier onboarding for non-trackers; good visual food logging. Cons: macro tracking and detailed reports require the paid plan.

Which one should you pick?

The honest truth about all of them

The best app is the one you'll actually open every day. App-hopping wastes the food library you build. Pick one, learn its quirks, and stay there for at least 90 days before deciding it's wrong.

Features worth caring about

Privacy and data ownership

Worth knowing: most of these apps sell anonymized data to food and pharma companies. Cronometer is the most privacy-respecting of the bunch (subscription-funded, fewer ads). MyFitnessPal had a major breach in 2018 — change passwords periodically. None of this changes the recommendation, but it's worth a moment of attention.

Related guides